Do vaccines increase or decrease the number of children who die in the first year of life? Two researchers set out to answer this question. You'll never guess what happened next.
Mar 3, 2023·edited Mar 3, 2023Liked by Robyn Chuter
Great stuff!
As a nerd spectator, I love it when "my" nerd team lands an odds ratio blow to the goolies. That's basically what the entire "Turtles all the way down" book is about.
IMO, the knockout blow is not in the deaths, but in the injuries. It is hard for most people to care about dead babies, especially if their own kids survived the jab Russian Roulette. Yet somehow they can manage to care about test scores and behavioural problems. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Parts-I-XII.pdf)
I think that's sad, but true. Far more parents are living with the devastating consequences of having followed the completely-untested vaccination schedule on their living child's health, behaviour and educational outcome, than are living with the devastation of losing their child.
And how about this. This about wraps up ALL vaccines. Disaster to the human CNS.
* Give children chickenpox vax = increased cases of shingles as adults.
* Give adults Shingles vax = they began falling ill with chickenpox.
"According to Dr. Gary Goldman, before the universal chickenpox or varicella vaccine was introduced in the USA in 1996, 95% of adults had experienced natural chickenpox, usually as children, and had life-long immunity. Subsequent exposures to natural chickenpox prevented or postponed shingles.
Childhood chickenpox vaccination programmes have increased the cases of shingles in adults by 100%. To counteract the dramatic increase in shingles cases, a shingles vaccine, Zostavax, was introduced. After the introduction of the shingles vaccine, adults began falling ill with chickenpox – a childhood disease.
Additionally, since the universal chickenpox vaccine was introduced, the high percentage of people with long-term immunity has been compromised. Vaccination at best provides 70%-90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration making these children susceptible to chickenpox as adults. It has, therefore, shifted chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 15 times more risk of hospitalisation and 20 times more risk of death compared to children"
Thanks for a great article, I find the work of Christine Stabell Benn fascinating, she could hardly be called an anti vaxxer but her research indicates that most vaccines increase all cause mortality
Christine Stabell Benn is a physician, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and a vaccine researcher with almost thirty years of experience in the field. The focus of her research is non-specific vaccine effects, i.e. all those other effects, both positive and negative, that vaccines have on our immune systems and overall health, beyond their very specific ability to protect against one infectious disease.
What she's found over the course of her research is that the overall effect on mortality varies greatly depending on whether a vaccine is "live" (i.e. contains a weakened but still complete version of the pathogen) or "non-live" (i.e. only contains a small part of the pathogen it's supposed to protect against).
Live vaccines tend to be associated with a reduction in overall mortality that goes far beyond the protection they offer against the specific pathogen. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, actually seem to increase overall mortality, so that whatever benefit they provide against a specific pathogen is outweighed by their negative overall health effects. This matters, because there has been a trend over the last few decades to replace live vaccines with non-live vaccines.
Unfortunately, when randomized trials of vaccines are run, they usually only look at the ability to protect against a specific pathogen, and thus fail to answer whether the vaccine provides an overall health benefit or not. Vaccine trials are also usually too short, because non-specific vaccine effects can last for years or in some cases even decades.
At the very least, a comprehensive examination of the full spectrum consequences of EACH jab, plus the jabs in combination, on the population. This would be quite easy to do in Australia since Medicare records are linked to the Australian Immunisation Register, but the govt has always refused to do it.
They will never agree to an independent study on vaccines, maybe a govt examination headed by John Skerritt is a possibility and we all know what the outcome would be. The comparisons of vaxxed and unvaxxed populations are an eye-opener, guess which ones are the healthiest.....
Ah, Pearson's r and p values - takes me back to the stats modules of my Psych degree. Not to forget the Spearman rho and multiple analysis of variance and the glorious chi-square test which I tried to use for everything because tit was the easiest - and I have lived to tell the tale of my close encounters with statistical testing.
Just like I appear to have survived my close encounters with the then childhood vaccination schedule in the mid 1950s when, although my memory is a bit fuzzy, it was basically the DPT, measles and mumps and polio shots that were the only ones on the list. Now, I have even given up my loyalty to the annual flu jab, too, thanks to the 'Covid' nonsense.
I don't think you would have had the measles or mumps shots in the 1950s; you probably only copped the DPT and polio. Looks like they didn't scramble your brains too much, if you could manage to slog your way through all those stats classes!
Great stuff!
As a nerd spectator, I love it when "my" nerd team lands an odds ratio blow to the goolies. That's basically what the entire "Turtles all the way down" book is about.
IMO, the knockout blow is not in the deaths, but in the injuries. It is hard for most people to care about dead babies, especially if their own kids survived the jab Russian Roulette. Yet somehow they can manage to care about test scores and behavioural problems. (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Vaxxed-Unvaxxed-Parts-I-XII.pdf)
I think that's sad, but true. Far more parents are living with the devastating consequences of having followed the completely-untested vaccination schedule on their living child's health, behaviour and educational outcome, than are living with the devastation of losing their child.
And how about this. This about wraps up ALL vaccines. Disaster to the human CNS.
* Give children chickenpox vax = increased cases of shingles as adults.
* Give adults Shingles vax = they began falling ill with chickenpox.
"According to Dr. Gary Goldman, before the universal chickenpox or varicella vaccine was introduced in the USA in 1996, 95% of adults had experienced natural chickenpox, usually as children, and had life-long immunity. Subsequent exposures to natural chickenpox prevented or postponed shingles.
Childhood chickenpox vaccination programmes have increased the cases of shingles in adults by 100%. To counteract the dramatic increase in shingles cases, a shingles vaccine, Zostavax, was introduced. After the introduction of the shingles vaccine, adults began falling ill with chickenpox – a childhood disease.
Additionally, since the universal chickenpox vaccine was introduced, the high percentage of people with long-term immunity has been compromised. Vaccination at best provides 70%-90% immunity that is temporary and of unknown duration making these children susceptible to chickenpox as adults. It has, therefore, shifted chickenpox to a more vulnerable adult population where chickenpox carries 15 times more risk of hospitalisation and 20 times more risk of death compared to children"
https://expose-news.com/2023/03/02/chickenpox-vaccines-result-in-outbreaks-of-shingles/
Yep, that's what I wrote about in https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/backlash-how-the-vaccine-pushers-c26/, referenced in this post.
Thank you. I read part of your post this a.m. and the rest now.
I mean, read these two bullets below. I want to either laugh out loud (hysterically) or puke. Or both.
* Chickenpox vaccine given to kids causes Shingles as they reach adulthood.
* Shingles vaccine given to older folks, causes Chickenpox which is normally a childhood 'disease'.
And yet the 'experts' and/or authorities hide this crazy fact.
Pure evil.
If vaccines were good there would be no need for mandates, propaganda, censorship of dissenting views and legal immunity to manufacturers.
Good treatments sell themselves.
Thanks for a great article, I find the work of Christine Stabell Benn fascinating, she could hardly be called an anti vaxxer but her research indicates that most vaccines increase all cause mortality
Christine Stabell Benn is a physician, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and a vaccine researcher with almost thirty years of experience in the field. The focus of her research is non-specific vaccine effects, i.e. all those other effects, both positive and negative, that vaccines have on our immune systems and overall health, beyond their very specific ability to protect against one infectious disease.
What she's found over the course of her research is that the overall effect on mortality varies greatly depending on whether a vaccine is "live" (i.e. contains a weakened but still complete version of the pathogen) or "non-live" (i.e. only contains a small part of the pathogen it's supposed to protect against).
Live vaccines tend to be associated with a reduction in overall mortality that goes far beyond the protection they offer against the specific pathogen. Non-live vaccines, on the other hand, actually seem to increase overall mortality, so that whatever benefit they provide against a specific pathogen is outweighed by their negative overall health effects. This matters, because there has been a trend over the last few decades to replace live vaccines with non-live vaccines.
Unfortunately, when randomized trials of vaccines are run, they usually only look at the ability to protect against a specific pathogen, and thus fail to answer whether the vaccine provides an overall health benefit or not. Vaccine trials are also usually too short, because non-specific vaccine effects can last for years or in some cases even decades.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcwg-Vzg9NU
https://unherd.com/thepost/study-into-mrna/
I was going to cover Christine Stabell-Benn and Peter Aaby's research on effects of the DPT vaccine in this post but it was already getting too long!
awesome , easy to follow article Robyn. !! shared widely already.
Thank you, sharing with others is the best way to get this information out there since there's no chance the lamestream media will ever cover it!
Brilliant article, can't wait for the knockout punch, get rid of all the toxic shots!
At the very least, a comprehensive examination of the full spectrum consequences of EACH jab, plus the jabs in combination, on the population. This would be quite easy to do in Australia since Medicare records are linked to the Australian Immunisation Register, but the govt has always refused to do it.
They will never agree to an independent study on vaccines, maybe a govt examination headed by John Skerritt is a possibility and we all know what the outcome would be. The comparisons of vaxxed and unvaxxed populations are an eye-opener, guess which ones are the healthiest.....
Ah, Pearson's r and p values - takes me back to the stats modules of my Psych degree. Not to forget the Spearman rho and multiple analysis of variance and the glorious chi-square test which I tried to use for everything because tit was the easiest - and I have lived to tell the tale of my close encounters with statistical testing.
Just like I appear to have survived my close encounters with the then childhood vaccination schedule in the mid 1950s when, although my memory is a bit fuzzy, it was basically the DPT, measles and mumps and polio shots that were the only ones on the list. Now, I have even given up my loyalty to the annual flu jab, too, thanks to the 'Covid' nonsense.
Many thanks for the article.
I don't think you would have had the measles or mumps shots in the 1950s; you probably only copped the DPT and polio. Looks like they didn't scramble your brains too much, if you could manage to slog your way through all those stats classes!
Thank you for the excellent extremely thorough article!
Thanks for reading!