How did we get to the point where anyone who asks even the most commonplace question about vaccines is reflexively reviled and dismissed as an "antivaxxer"?
Another fantastic article Robyn. If only this kind of fearless investigative pursuit of the actual truth still existed in the vast majority of journalism (possibly the most dangerous of all of the captured industries due to the role it should be playing in revealing the truth to a largely moulded society of cookie-cutter robots spat out of the western education system).
I’m in agreement with you now that the only way out of this mess is to come together to form our own parallel systems that we can grow over time, likely a slow and painful process but I don’t see many other alternatives.
Writers such as yourself and the fantastic Mathew Crawford of RTE have been wonderful finds for throughout the plandemonium, thanks again!
The fourth estate is no longer operative as a check on power. Only citizen journalists are independent enough to serve the role that was supposed to be played by the media.
And yes, the existing institutions are beyond reform. We have to build our own and make the existing ones obsolete.
For me, I got the point simply because it gradually dawned on me that this was becoming ideological and marxist. So when I sought refuge, it led me down rabbit holes, some of which are probably conspiratorial, other's opened my eyes. I still don't know whether or not viruses exist, but I'm becoming very sympathetic to the notion that the body has an innate ability to heal itself. I have heard that children who naturally get chicken pox as a kid have a lower likelihood of getting solid tumour cancers later in life. Is this true ? If so, perhaps the chicken pox infection is an important milestone in growing up. I have also heard that incidents of other disease like measles were well on the wane before vaccination rolled out. Perhaps indicative of improved living standards, cleaner water etc. Had it not been for the 'pandemic' and mandates, I would not invested time in this. What's missing is a respectful debate among both side. On my list is a book called Dissolving Illusions, https://dissolvingillusions.com.
I also wonder whether the higher incidence of allergies and autism is due to the increased number of vaccines , perhaps due to some of the ingredients.
There's very good evidence that people who had common childhood illnesses like measles and chickenpox have a lower rate of blood cancers as well as atopic disorders such as eczema. And there's absolutely no doubt that rates of death and serious illness from infectious disease had already tanked long before vaccines for these diseases were introduced (see https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/beating-measles-with-toilets-the).
Mine too! And one of Mendelsohn's other books, How To Raise A Healthy Child In Spite Of Your Doctor, became my go-to reference once I had kids, and one of my top recommendations to clients.
I also had that one. In fact, looking at the book case behind me, I just realized I still have "Confessions.. The jacket is very faded. The other groundbreaking book that I still have is 'Medical Nemesis" by Ivan Illich, where I first heard the term Iatrogenic Disease.
Voltaire was right about the art of medicine. He must be turning in his grave to see the business of medicine is now to maximise return on research investment, where return is measured in dollars and deaths.
Kudos Robyn for another 3 parts of Truth and may the backlash swell into a giant tsunami!
I see promising signs; the CDC is on the run, life insurance data demonstrating increased payouts are rolling in, and parents of young kids are staying away from the shots in droves. I don't want to get my hopes up too high, but I think they/them/those may have overplayed their hand.
The cynic in me thinks it's because there's an election coming up, the optimistic hopes its due too some explosive legal challenge that is about to break
You are like a highly intelligent and skilled detective. Hunting down the elusive facts and exposing the criminals attached to the sickness big Pharma drug industry.
It is kind of like a detective story, or perhaps a giant jigsaw puzzle that you have to look at for a long time before you see how the pieces fit together.
I guess what is even worse is the astounding number of people who confuse technological advancements with “science”. Technology develops by taking a little bit of multiple phenomena in order to manufacture something useful. Science is the opposite and is supposed to find the unifying principles that explain individual phenomena. All the morons shouting “trust the science!” don’t know what science is and no wonder they became volunteers to the WEF depopulation programme.
Public health doctors are probably the stupidest doctors who graduate from medical schools. The smart ones usually specialize in high paying areas such as the surgical specialities, among others. Given PHOs have a hammer (vaccines), everything for them becomes a nail.
Most people who go into the public health field don't have medical training. That makes total sense, because their philosophies are completely opposite. The practise of medicine is founded on the doctor-patient relationship; a doctor should never do anything that might harm their patient "for the greater good". Public health is founded on the notion of collective good, and this not infrequently results in the sacrifice of individuals. I wrote about this fundamental incompatibility of ethos in https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/your-doctor-is-not-your-doctor.
There's a small percentage of doctors who do a postgraduate qualification in public health (usually a Masters degree) but they generally continue to work as doctors. And yes, those who can't make a go of it in private practice might find the prospect of a government sinecure as a 'public health doctor' much more attractive.
No wonder why these monsters seem to be completely unable to link the numbers they see on their spreadsheet to what they refer to in reality (people who are suffering, dying etc). Furthermore there is the problem most of them are communists and are infected with the revolutionary mentality. They think everything will be better in the future only if you give them just a little bit more power in the present so they can do whatever they want in order to create their version of a better world.
It's a huge problem that 'public health officials' never have any real contact with the 'public' that they're presiding over. Mind you, there are plenty of doctors who are turning a blind eye to the enormous suffering that they've inflicted on their patients, and indeed are gaslighting them by telling them that their injection injuries are in fact just 'anxiety'.
I think you're right that many of these bureaucrats are infected by reformist zeal, arrogantly assuming that if only they could be given more power to impose their will upon the masses, the stupid rubes would be so much better off than if they were left alone to live their lives as they see fit. It reminds me of C. S. Lewis' famous line, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies."
The entire field of public health has been co-opted. The achievements of the pioneers of public health were astounding - sanitation, sewage disposal, cleaning up the slums and factories, food safety laws - but ever since Big Pharma sunk its talons in, public health has been circling the drain.
Yes, agreed however there are still a lot of people with medical degrees and post-grad qualifications in public health including the current head of the CDC who just has to be conflicted on about every decision she has to take. Keep up the good work, it's important to know we are not alone.
Most “scientists” are just whores after grant money. Most universities could be torn down and carparks could be built in place, and no one would even notice.
Another fantastic article Robyn. If only this kind of fearless investigative pursuit of the actual truth still existed in the vast majority of journalism (possibly the most dangerous of all of the captured industries due to the role it should be playing in revealing the truth to a largely moulded society of cookie-cutter robots spat out of the western education system).
I’m in agreement with you now that the only way out of this mess is to come together to form our own parallel systems that we can grow over time, likely a slow and painful process but I don’t see many other alternatives.
Writers such as yourself and the fantastic Mathew Crawford of RTE have been wonderful finds for throughout the plandemonium, thanks again!
P.S. I'm a huge Mathew Crawford fangirl. His was one of the first Substacks I subscribed to.
He is brilliant! The cream always rises to the top hey 😉😊
The fourth estate is no longer operative as a check on power. Only citizen journalists are independent enough to serve the role that was supposed to be played by the media.
And yes, the existing institutions are beyond reform. We have to build our own and make the existing ones obsolete.
Wow unbelievably good article.. took me a few days to digest, brilliant
Thanks for sticking with it!
For me, I got the point simply because it gradually dawned on me that this was becoming ideological and marxist. So when I sought refuge, it led me down rabbit holes, some of which are probably conspiratorial, other's opened my eyes. I still don't know whether or not viruses exist, but I'm becoming very sympathetic to the notion that the body has an innate ability to heal itself. I have heard that children who naturally get chicken pox as a kid have a lower likelihood of getting solid tumour cancers later in life. Is this true ? If so, perhaps the chicken pox infection is an important milestone in growing up. I have also heard that incidents of other disease like measles were well on the wane before vaccination rolled out. Perhaps indicative of improved living standards, cleaner water etc. Had it not been for the 'pandemic' and mandates, I would not invested time in this. What's missing is a respectful debate among both side. On my list is a book called Dissolving Illusions, https://dissolvingillusions.com.
I also wonder whether the higher incidence of allergies and autism is due to the increased number of vaccines , perhaps due to some of the ingredients.
There's very good evidence that people who had common childhood illnesses like measles and chickenpox have a lower rate of blood cancers as well as atopic disorders such as eczema. And there's absolutely no doubt that rates of death and serious illness from infectious disease had already tanked long before vaccines for these diseases were introduced (see https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/beating-measles-with-toilets-the).
Agreed, there are positive signs of life out there, long may it continue.
Fantastic article! It will get added to www.WePatriot.org where the best covid articles are organized.
Thank you, that's a huge honour.
Confessions of a Medical Heretic. Wow, I read that book in the 1970s; it sure opened my eyes.
Mine too! And one of Mendelsohn's other books, How To Raise A Healthy Child In Spite Of Your Doctor, became my go-to reference once I had kids, and one of my top recommendations to clients.
I also had that one. In fact, looking at the book case behind me, I just realized I still have "Confessions.. The jacket is very faded. The other groundbreaking book that I still have is 'Medical Nemesis" by Ivan Illich, where I first heard the term Iatrogenic Disease.
Illich was a brilliant thinker, so ahead of his time.
Few heeded his warnings.
Voltaire was right about the art of medicine. He must be turning in his grave to see the business of medicine is now to maximise return on research investment, where return is measured in dollars and deaths.
Kudos Robyn for another 3 parts of Truth and may the backlash swell into a giant tsunami!
I see promising signs; the CDC is on the run, life insurance data demonstrating increased payouts are rolling in, and parents of young kids are staying away from the shots in droves. I don't want to get my hopes up too high, but I think they/them/those may have overplayed their hand.
The cynic in me thinks it's because there's an election coming up, the optimistic hopes its due too some explosive legal challenge that is about to break
Leave room for both the cynic and the optimist - they're both needed!
Excellent points. Thank you for your valuable insights!
Thank YOU for taking the time to read my work.
You are like a highly intelligent and skilled detective. Hunting down the elusive facts and exposing the criminals attached to the sickness big Pharma drug industry.
It is kind of like a detective story, or perhaps a giant jigsaw puzzle that you have to look at for a long time before you see how the pieces fit together.
I guess what is even worse is the astounding number of people who confuse technological advancements with “science”. Technology develops by taking a little bit of multiple phenomena in order to manufacture something useful. Science is the opposite and is supposed to find the unifying principles that explain individual phenomena. All the morons shouting “trust the science!” don’t know what science is and no wonder they became volunteers to the WEF depopulation programme.
"Trust the science" is the most ridiculous mantra ever.
Public health doctors are probably the stupidest doctors who graduate from medical schools. The smart ones usually specialize in high paying areas such as the surgical specialities, among others. Given PHOs have a hammer (vaccines), everything for them becomes a nail.
Most people who go into the public health field don't have medical training. That makes total sense, because their philosophies are completely opposite. The practise of medicine is founded on the doctor-patient relationship; a doctor should never do anything that might harm their patient "for the greater good". Public health is founded on the notion of collective good, and this not infrequently results in the sacrifice of individuals. I wrote about this fundamental incompatibility of ethos in https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/your-doctor-is-not-your-doctor.
There's a small percentage of doctors who do a postgraduate qualification in public health (usually a Masters degree) but they generally continue to work as doctors. And yes, those who can't make a go of it in private practice might find the prospect of a government sinecure as a 'public health doctor' much more attractive.
No wonder why these monsters seem to be completely unable to link the numbers they see on their spreadsheet to what they refer to in reality (people who are suffering, dying etc). Furthermore there is the problem most of them are communists and are infected with the revolutionary mentality. They think everything will be better in the future only if you give them just a little bit more power in the present so they can do whatever they want in order to create their version of a better world.
It's a huge problem that 'public health officials' never have any real contact with the 'public' that they're presiding over. Mind you, there are plenty of doctors who are turning a blind eye to the enormous suffering that they've inflicted on their patients, and indeed are gaslighting them by telling them that their injection injuries are in fact just 'anxiety'.
I think you're right that many of these bureaucrats are infected by reformist zeal, arrogantly assuming that if only they could be given more power to impose their will upon the masses, the stupid rubes would be so much better off than if they were left alone to live their lives as they see fit. It reminds me of C. S. Lewis' famous line, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies."
The entire field of public health has been co-opted. The achievements of the pioneers of public health were astounding - sanitation, sewage disposal, cleaning up the slums and factories, food safety laws - but ever since Big Pharma sunk its talons in, public health has been circling the drain.
An old saying within one of the significant surgical disciplines:
"If you can operate then do so; If you can't operate then teach; If you can't operate or teach then become a public health official"
Says it all does it not?
I didn't know that this was 'a thing' among surgeons! Makes total sense though, from what I've seen of both surgeons and public heath officials.
Yes, agreed however there are still a lot of people with medical degrees and post-grad qualifications in public health including the current head of the CDC who just has to be conflicted on about every decision she has to take. Keep up the good work, it's important to know we are not alone.
Walensky appears to be to be pretty thick. A useful idiot for the puppet-masters.
Most “scientists” are just whores after grant money. Most universities could be torn down and carparks could be built in place, and no one would even notice.
We would notice that there was a lot less insanity being peddled if many of those useless academics were forced to get a real job!