It’s beginning to look a lot like… Federal election season. And that means our Federal members suddenly remember that you and I exist, and want to get their names and bona fides under our noses. A couple of days ago, I received the following email from my MP, Keith Pitt:
Would like to see the constitutional Law that prevents the federal government from intervening on state government laws and policies, clearly Darlene has never read the Australian constitution?
Thank you for highlighting the hypocrisy, and for challenging politicians. We are listening.
Covid vaccinations have been shown to be…
-unsafe and ineffective -
….but too bad if you want employment or scientific justification.
Great advice- Follow the politicians and vote those who support mandates and suppress early treatment last. No wonder the fringe parties people have never voted for are increasing their votes.
How is it the unvaccinated can be repeatedly asked - and more than welcome to donate blood and save 3 lives every donation, - but treated with disdain within many medical services. They can roam around shops but cannot work there. They cannot play golf outside on their own but can travel on a train. The list goes on and on and the state comparisons are becoming even more bizarre. Teachers in SA can work but not in Vic. Nurses require booster in Vic -, but not in NSW…. Police can work in SA and NZ but not Vic or NSW. We thought Australia was worse than New Zealand - not any more, they have dropped most of their mandates…like most of the world - their data cannot justify the reality - whatever spin and propaganda the press produce only someone of low intelligence could not see the reality of government control and punishment. Karma awaits those who punish.
So, you've been writing to politicians again, Robyn, expecting an honest exchange of views and a respectful engagement on the issues based on health science evidence. Another triumph of hope over expectation, I'm afraid. Charlie Brown, too, kept expecting that, this time, Lucy would hold the football for him for a place kick. Politicians, like the Lucy's of the world, however, live in a different world to their well-meaning citizens. They want your vote, and your vote only. They don't want to debate informed, principled constituents.
Still, as you argue, you have your vote and you know how to use it! Put the Covid incumbents dead last, regardless of any legacy political affiliations - and put the freedom candidates first.
here in the Kingdom of Mark the Magnificent, it's no better (of course). My local would be new member for Perth (a so called "Liberal") studiously refuses to answer my questions about mandates. Says he's all about "small business". That many of them have gone/are going to the wall seems to have eluded him.
Absolutely brilliant, Robyn! You've pretty much summed up my position too, although much more articulately. Sadly I suspect you'll get either another inadequate and dithering reply, or no reply at all. I'll await with interest and hope I'm proved wrong.
very nicely written. I completely agree with you on all points. In your case you actually received a reply from the electorate office, in our case we've sent multiple emails to our local member (Hume) and it's been crickets all the way. And contacting the state member achieves the same result, both the LNP and Labor are captive to these international criminal oranisations.
I suspect if you contact the labor candidate for your seat asking the same questions you'll get some garbage canned reply supplied by the national office that addresses even fewer of your concerns than this drivel did.
Normally we can rely on the websites for candidates for the policies to help make decisions, however at this point in time, at least for the house of reps, we're going to need to contact each and every candidate to get their position on these questions to help make the decision.
I think the best we can hope for is a hung parliament in the lower house with anti-mandate parties holding the balance of power (unfortunately I don't think this is going to happen, most people are too stupid to recognise that their choice is much wider than the Labor/LNP divide, but I may be pleasantly surprised with UAP and One Nation running candiates much more widely), with a senate where the balance of power is held by UAP, One Nation, LDP and other anti-mandate parties.
Of course, this would not be palatable to a lot of people, but right now I believe that the existential threat of the 'health' policies at both a state and federal level is significantly greater than the other threats we are facing.
After all, all registered health practitioners are being pushed to align with the medical system, even if they're working in a field which traditionally doesn't support the current medical paradigm.
Love it Robyn. Can just see Darlenes confused expression. I was wanting to reply to my incumbent here in fnq and didnt know where to start but youve inspired me again. Cheers will keep you posted on any reply
Lovely. I got the similar waffle from the other side. The hardest decision to make is who to put last. And furthermore, anyone with balls could have simply refused access to the immunisation register or refused further or any Jobkeeper payments ... I’m guessing lockdown would have been shorter in Vic without a federal government handout.
As part of my road trip to Cairns, I have seen a lot of UAP billboards and I hope that they and other “freedom” aligned parties can take a few seats.
Personally I would have hated being in the Governments shoes during Covid - it was always a lose:lose situation. Everyone has an opinion on what needed to be done but did nothing about it. You can see by reaction in society that people are split on vaccination mandates. I’m anti-vax as I’m fir personal choice in these matters.
I have little time for those who have a single issue when it comes to voting. To me they are ignorant and selfish and care little about their nation. I am also fascinated that you haven’t asked the other parties the same question. Why aren’t you asking Labor? Keep us posted.
Well written Robyn! I am 200% behind you! I have no time for their nonsense and their ridiculous statements!
Would like to see the constitutional Law that prevents the federal government from intervening on state government laws and policies, clearly Darlene has never read the Australian constitution?
Thank you for highlighting the hypocrisy, and for challenging politicians. We are listening.
Covid vaccinations have been shown to be…
-unsafe and ineffective -
….but too bad if you want employment or scientific justification.
Great advice- Follow the politicians and vote those who support mandates and suppress early treatment last. No wonder the fringe parties people have never voted for are increasing their votes.
How is it the unvaccinated can be repeatedly asked - and more than welcome to donate blood and save 3 lives every donation, - but treated with disdain within many medical services. They can roam around shops but cannot work there. They cannot play golf outside on their own but can travel on a train. The list goes on and on and the state comparisons are becoming even more bizarre. Teachers in SA can work but not in Vic. Nurses require booster in Vic -, but not in NSW…. Police can work in SA and NZ but not Vic or NSW. We thought Australia was worse than New Zealand - not any more, they have dropped most of their mandates…like most of the world - their data cannot justify the reality - whatever spin and propaganda the press produce only someone of low intelligence could not see the reality of government control and punishment. Karma awaits those who punish.
So, you've been writing to politicians again, Robyn, expecting an honest exchange of views and a respectful engagement on the issues based on health science evidence. Another triumph of hope over expectation, I'm afraid. Charlie Brown, too, kept expecting that, this time, Lucy would hold the football for him for a place kick. Politicians, like the Lucy's of the world, however, live in a different world to their well-meaning citizens. They want your vote, and your vote only. They don't want to debate informed, principled constituents.
Still, as you argue, you have your vote and you know how to use it! Put the Covid incumbents dead last, regardless of any legacy political affiliations - and put the freedom candidates first.
Cheers!
here in the Kingdom of Mark the Magnificent, it's no better (of course). My local would be new member for Perth (a so called "Liberal") studiously refuses to answer my questions about mandates. Says he's all about "small business". That many of them have gone/are going to the wall seems to have eluded him.
Brilliant and all very valid points. I look forward to hearing the response, if it comes :-) Thank you for all the great articles that you post
Absolutely brilliant, Robyn! You've pretty much summed up my position too, although much more articulately. Sadly I suspect you'll get either another inadequate and dithering reply, or no reply at all. I'll await with interest and hope I'm proved wrong.
very nicely written. I completely agree with you on all points. In your case you actually received a reply from the electorate office, in our case we've sent multiple emails to our local member (Hume) and it's been crickets all the way. And contacting the state member achieves the same result, both the LNP and Labor are captive to these international criminal oranisations.
I suspect if you contact the labor candidate for your seat asking the same questions you'll get some garbage canned reply supplied by the national office that addresses even fewer of your concerns than this drivel did.
Normally we can rely on the websites for candidates for the policies to help make decisions, however at this point in time, at least for the house of reps, we're going to need to contact each and every candidate to get their position on these questions to help make the decision.
I think the best we can hope for is a hung parliament in the lower house with anti-mandate parties holding the balance of power (unfortunately I don't think this is going to happen, most people are too stupid to recognise that their choice is much wider than the Labor/LNP divide, but I may be pleasantly surprised with UAP and One Nation running candiates much more widely), with a senate where the balance of power is held by UAP, One Nation, LDP and other anti-mandate parties.
Of course, this would not be palatable to a lot of people, but right now I believe that the existential threat of the 'health' policies at both a state and federal level is significantly greater than the other threats we are facing.
After all, all registered health practitioners are being pushed to align with the medical system, even if they're working in a field which traditionally doesn't support the current medical paradigm.
Love it Robyn. Can just see Darlenes confused expression. I was wanting to reply to my incumbent here in fnq and didnt know where to start but youve inspired me again. Cheers will keep you posted on any reply
Lovely. I got the similar waffle from the other side. The hardest decision to make is who to put last. And furthermore, anyone with balls could have simply refused access to the immunisation register or refused further or any Jobkeeper payments ... I’m guessing lockdown would have been shorter in Vic without a federal government handout.
As part of my road trip to Cairns, I have seen a lot of UAP billboards and I hope that they and other “freedom” aligned parties can take a few seats.
Personally I would have hated being in the Governments shoes during Covid - it was always a lose:lose situation. Everyone has an opinion on what needed to be done but did nothing about it. You can see by reaction in society that people are split on vaccination mandates. I’m anti-vax as I’m fir personal choice in these matters.
I have little time for those who have a single issue when it comes to voting. To me they are ignorant and selfish and care little about their nation. I am also fascinated that you haven’t asked the other parties the same question. Why aren’t you asking Labor? Keep us posted.