The credible evidence they claim doesn't exist also includes actuarial data, insurance data, coroner reports, trial data, admissions of fraud under oath, court rulings, submissions addressed directly to them from groups of honest doctors, and death as, literally, a listed side-effect. Traditionally, less credible evidence is anecdotal, however with such widespread corruption in this 5g warfare, particularly of 'science', i argue that anecdotal evidence is currently gold standard.
This post is outstanding. The excellent summary of the many ways the experimental Covid-19 injections cause disease and death is especially illuminating -- and very helpful to have captured in one place. Thank you for your excellent work!
Love your style, much like my own on my secondary substack (Full Broadside). Discussing with my wife whether she will consider a consultation with you for her chronic scleroderma. I want her off those damn drugs so much. Thank you.
Terrific summary - put's academic meat on the bones of my suspicions.
On an anticipated shingles surge following compromised immune systems post-vaccine, my heart goes out to the jabbed for what is to come. I had shingles a decade ago and, apart from the inflammatory response with flu-like symptoms, the post-infection neuralgia was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, a pain that I wouldn't wish on even the most ideologically belligerent pro-Covid-vaxxer.
But, still, there's a vaccine for that, of course, and it could well be an mRNA one if the future of mRNA vaccines for every disease under the sun comes to pass. With the stunning success of the Covid mRNA 'vaccines', what could possibly go wrong with that scenario?
I notice our PM has plenty of time to entertain Billy G and plan for the next 'pandemic,' but Aussies dropping dead since the shots were forced upon the public doesn't pique his interest, the silence is deafening! Great post again BTW.
Short time ago, a friend from Peru told me that her best friend died during sleep, due to a severe heart attack. She was 26 years old and she was okay, she still talked to people before she went to bed. However, in that night she had this severe heart attack and never woke up any more.
I can not tell 100% if she was vaccinated but it is 99% certain because this is Peru and almost all younger people there are vaccinated, otherwise they were not even allowed to visit a normal supermarket.... Yeah, Peru is one of the worst tyrannical places with regard to covid policies. And I also told my friend that it was likely the vaccine and she did not disagree.. I mean, had her best friend not been vaccinated, she would have told me that in the moment when I suspected that it was the vaccine.
She died on a Sunday and was buried on the following Tuesday. On Tuesday, short time before they wanted to bury her, she suddenly had blood in her mouth and on her head... that ran and dropped down, so they had to clean it... This was extremely traumatic for my friend and for the familiy of this dead person... So now I am wondering, is this normal? Do dead people suddenly start bleeding out of their mouth a few days after they died?
My friend believes that they had done an autopsy or so and that this has caused the bleeding, but why so late? If the autopsy caused it, then why did it not start immediately during or after the autopsy? Why did it start right before they wanted to bury her?
So, I wanted to ask you, Robyn, could these bleedings in some way be an indication that the vaccine was involved here or is this just a normal happening?
Robyn, I read your post when you first published it and then again today. It’s truly outstanding. You’ve done a real service summarizing in one place the many ways the experimental Covid injections cause harm.
One of the mechanisms, impaired immune function, makes clear the transfection agents damage the immune system and make people more susceptible to infection. An article on viral interference (authored by Amber Dance) got my attention. It quotes Richard Webby, a virologist, for the proposition that viral interference from Covid may have shut down flu and RSV for the first couple of years of the declared pandemic. Webby says that now that many people have been infected with Covid and have some degree of immunity against it, Covid infections no longer are holding back flu and RSV, effectively explaining why those illnesses now are making a comeback.
I wonder what you think about that argument. (Webby is a Director of a WHO Collaborating Center, so he's suspect in my book.) The same article initially claims that masks and lockdowns were responsible for "preventing flu and RSV from infiltrating human nostrils.” The article is ambiguous about whether Webby is responsible for that claim or whether the idea about masks and lockdowns having stopped flu and RSV for two years is the author’s invention. Regardless, I know masks and lockdowns are completely ineffective at stopping transmission of airborne viruses (and may even increase rates of transmission in lots of ways, including that contaminated masks become vectors for disease transmission while also exposing the wearer to more concentrated viral loads, and lockdowns prevent people from exercising and getting fresh air while confining them to enclosed spaces where they are more likely to be infected). If the article makes such a ridiculous assertion about masks and lockdowns, should we have confidence in what it says about viral interference?
I’ve always thought it likely that the real reason for the absence of flu and RSV during the past couple of years is that flu, RSV, colds, and the “crud” all were re-labeled as Covid to ramp up fake case counts, and so I wonder whether the suggestion that viral interference explains the two-year absence of other respiratory infections is simply cover for having falsely re-labeled flu as Covid for a couple of years. Indeed, as for the idea that Covid no longer is holding flu/RSV in check, it’s my understanding that there is as much or more Covid circulating right now as at any time during the declared pandemic. If viral interference really could explain the absence of flu and RSV, then shouldn’t Covid still be holding the other respiratory illnesses in check?
The credible evidence they claim doesn't exist also includes actuarial data, insurance data, coroner reports, trial data, admissions of fraud under oath, court rulings, submissions addressed directly to them from groups of honest doctors, and death as, literally, a listed side-effect. Traditionally, less credible evidence is anecdotal, however with such widespread corruption in this 5g warfare, particularly of 'science', i argue that anecdotal evidence is currently gold standard.
This post is outstanding. The excellent summary of the many ways the experimental Covid-19 injections cause disease and death is especially illuminating -- and very helpful to have captured in one place. Thank you for your excellent work!
A top post, Robyn. It must be one of the best Substack posts ever. It certainly gets my vote for the best 'Stick it Right Up Them Award'.
Love your style, much like my own on my secondary substack (Full Broadside). Discussing with my wife whether she will consider a consultation with you for her chronic scleroderma. I want her off those damn drugs so much. Thank you.
Terrific summary - put's academic meat on the bones of my suspicions.
On an anticipated shingles surge following compromised immune systems post-vaccine, my heart goes out to the jabbed for what is to come. I had shingles a decade ago and, apart from the inflammatory response with flu-like symptoms, the post-infection neuralgia was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, a pain that I wouldn't wish on even the most ideologically belligerent pro-Covid-vaxxer.
But, still, there's a vaccine for that, of course, and it could well be an mRNA one if the future of mRNA vaccines for every disease under the sun comes to pass. With the stunning success of the Covid mRNA 'vaccines', what could possibly go wrong with that scenario?
Shared to QLD Health FB page...as usual!
Fantastic work, Robyn! How long can they possibly keep up this wilful ignorance?!
I notice our PM has plenty of time to entertain Billy G and plan for the next 'pandemic,' but Aussies dropping dead since the shots were forced upon the public doesn't pique his interest, the silence is deafening! Great post again BTW.
Great article, as always! And shocking.
Short time ago, a friend from Peru told me that her best friend died during sleep, due to a severe heart attack. She was 26 years old and she was okay, she still talked to people before she went to bed. However, in that night she had this severe heart attack and never woke up any more.
I can not tell 100% if she was vaccinated but it is 99% certain because this is Peru and almost all younger people there are vaccinated, otherwise they were not even allowed to visit a normal supermarket.... Yeah, Peru is one of the worst tyrannical places with regard to covid policies. And I also told my friend that it was likely the vaccine and she did not disagree.. I mean, had her best friend not been vaccinated, she would have told me that in the moment when I suspected that it was the vaccine.
She died on a Sunday and was buried on the following Tuesday. On Tuesday, short time before they wanted to bury her, she suddenly had blood in her mouth and on her head... that ran and dropped down, so they had to clean it... This was extremely traumatic for my friend and for the familiy of this dead person... So now I am wondering, is this normal? Do dead people suddenly start bleeding out of their mouth a few days after they died?
My friend believes that they had done an autopsy or so and that this has caused the bleeding, but why so late? If the autopsy caused it, then why did it not start immediately during or after the autopsy? Why did it start right before they wanted to bury her?
So, I wanted to ask you, Robyn, could these bleedings in some way be an indication that the vaccine was involved here or is this just a normal happening?
Robyn, I read your post when you first published it and then again today. It’s truly outstanding. You’ve done a real service summarizing in one place the many ways the experimental Covid injections cause harm.
One of the mechanisms, impaired immune function, makes clear the transfection agents damage the immune system and make people more susceptible to infection. An article on viral interference (authored by Amber Dance) got my attention. It quotes Richard Webby, a virologist, for the proposition that viral interference from Covid may have shut down flu and RSV for the first couple of years of the declared pandemic. Webby says that now that many people have been infected with Covid and have some degree of immunity against it, Covid infections no longer are holding back flu and RSV, effectively explaining why those illnesses now are making a comeback.
I wonder what you think about that argument. (Webby is a Director of a WHO Collaborating Center, so he's suspect in my book.) The same article initially claims that masks and lockdowns were responsible for "preventing flu and RSV from infiltrating human nostrils.” The article is ambiguous about whether Webby is responsible for that claim or whether the idea about masks and lockdowns having stopped flu and RSV for two years is the author’s invention. Regardless, I know masks and lockdowns are completely ineffective at stopping transmission of airborne viruses (and may even increase rates of transmission in lots of ways, including that contaminated masks become vectors for disease transmission while also exposing the wearer to more concentrated viral loads, and lockdowns prevent people from exercising and getting fresh air while confining them to enclosed spaces where they are more likely to be infected). If the article makes such a ridiculous assertion about masks and lockdowns, should we have confidence in what it says about viral interference?
I’ve always thought it likely that the real reason for the absence of flu and RSV during the past couple of years is that flu, RSV, colds, and the “crud” all were re-labeled as Covid to ramp up fake case counts, and so I wonder whether the suggestion that viral interference explains the two-year absence of other respiratory infections is simply cover for having falsely re-labeled flu as Covid for a couple of years. Indeed, as for the idea that Covid no longer is holding flu/RSV in check, it’s my understanding that there is as much or more Covid circulating right now as at any time during the declared pandemic. If viral interference really could explain the absence of flu and RSV, then shouldn’t Covid still be holding the other respiratory illnesses in check?