The credible evidence they claim doesn't exist also includes actuarial data, insurance data, coroner reports, trial data, admissions of fraud under oath, court rulings, submissions addressed directly to them from groups of honest doctors, and death as, literally, a listed side-effect. Traditionally, less credible evidence is anecdotal, however with such widespread corruption in this 5g warfare, particularly of 'science', i argue that anecdotal evidence is currently gold standard.
The scientific process begins with observation of a phenomenon, which is essentially an anecdote, and then forming a hypothesis to test via an experiment or study. As in "Anecdotally, I am noticing that lots of healthy young and middle-aged people are abruptly dropping dead. I hypothesise that their deaths are due to them being exposed to a novel technology never before deployed en masse upon human beings. I would like to test my hypothesis by comparing the death rate and causes of death in people who have taken the experimental technology, to the rate and causes in people who have not. Please provide me with deidentified data on the 'vaccination' status of all people who have died in the last 2 years, which can be obtained through the Australian Immunisation Register which is linked to each Australian's Medicare number. Oh, you can't/won't provide me with this information, because... reasons?"
This post is outstanding. The excellent summary of the many ways the experimental Covid-19 injections cause disease and death is especially illuminating -- and very helpful to have captured in one place. Thank you for your excellent work!
Thank you for reading it. It's grim work, bringing all of this together, but I really feel it has to be done in order to arm people against all the lies.
Thank you, that means a lot to me. I would dearly love to deliver that award in person, especially to the media whores whose complicity has been crucial to the success of this entire operation.
Love your style, much like my own on my secondary substack (Full Broadside). Discussing with my wife whether she will consider a consultation with you for her chronic scleroderma. I want her off those damn drugs so much. Thank you.
Thank you. She is pretty stubborn and resigned to a dreary, chronically ill life, sadly. She seems convinced you won't be able to help even before she has tried. I'll do my best to persuade but it's gunna be difficult.
I got into bush food and herbalism in the hope of finding some plants that might replace the toxic poisons the white coats are administering her. It's slow progress. I publish one or two new species per month. Cheers.
Sorry to hear that. It's very frustrating to be close to someone who has given up on themselves. I've had this happen in my own family. All you can do is put the information in front of her, and hope that she will show interest in it.
Terrific summary - put's academic meat on the bones of my suspicions.
On an anticipated shingles surge following compromised immune systems post-vaccine, my heart goes out to the jabbed for what is to come. I had shingles a decade ago and, apart from the inflammatory response with flu-like symptoms, the post-infection neuralgia was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, a pain that I wouldn't wish on even the most ideologically belligerent pro-Covid-vaxxer.
But, still, there's a vaccine for that, of course, and it could well be an mRNA one if the future of mRNA vaccines for every disease under the sun comes to pass. With the stunning success of the Covid mRNA 'vaccines', what could possibly go wrong with that scenario?
I notice our PM has plenty of time to entertain Billy G and plan for the next 'pandemic,' but Aussies dropping dead since the shots were forced upon the public doesn't pique his interest, the silence is deafening! Great post again BTW.
It's beyond disgusting that Albo the Brave can have an 'audience' with Gates (at taxpayers' expense, naturally) but we, the people he is supposed to be representing, aren't given a transcript of their discussion. And not a peep from the media about how inappropriate this is.
Totally agree, why all the secrecy? Albo the brave, ma ha ha! Sadly, it's even less accurate to call him Albo the intelligent, have you seen this 2 minute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LxLMEXEkOrlM/
Short time ago, a friend from Peru told me that her best friend died during sleep, due to a severe heart attack. She was 26 years old and she was okay, she still talked to people before she went to bed. However, in that night she had this severe heart attack and never woke up any more.
I can not tell 100% if she was vaccinated but it is 99% certain because this is Peru and almost all younger people there are vaccinated, otherwise they were not even allowed to visit a normal supermarket.... Yeah, Peru is one of the worst tyrannical places with regard to covid policies. And I also told my friend that it was likely the vaccine and she did not disagree.. I mean, had her best friend not been vaccinated, she would have told me that in the moment when I suspected that it was the vaccine.
She died on a Sunday and was buried on the following Tuesday. On Tuesday, short time before they wanted to bury her, she suddenly had blood in her mouth and on her head... that ran and dropped down, so they had to clean it... This was extremely traumatic for my friend and for the familiy of this dead person... So now I am wondering, is this normal? Do dead people suddenly start bleeding out of their mouth a few days after they died?
My friend believes that they had done an autopsy or so and that this has caused the bleeding, but why so late? If the autopsy caused it, then why did it not start immediately during or after the autopsy? Why did it start right before they wanted to bury her?
So, I wanted to ask you, Robyn, could these bleedings in some way be an indication that the vaccine was involved here or is this just a normal happening?
I'm so sorry to hear about your Peruvian friend's best friend. From what I've heard, Peru was an utter hell-hole during the scamdemic.
As for her friend bleeding from her mouth 2 days after death, I have never heard of this in my life. Blood begins to pool and coagulate in the lower part of the body within hours of death (livor mortis). To have blood running from her mouth and head is just extraordinary. Perhaps you could reach out to Dr Ryan Col (https://twitter.com/drcole12) to get his take.
Robyn, I read your post when you first published it and then again today. It’s truly outstanding. You’ve done a real service summarizing in one place the many ways the experimental Covid injections cause harm.
One of the mechanisms, impaired immune function, makes clear the transfection agents damage the immune system and make people more susceptible to infection. An article on viral interference (authored by Amber Dance) got my attention. It quotes Richard Webby, a virologist, for the proposition that viral interference from Covid may have shut down flu and RSV for the first couple of years of the declared pandemic. Webby says that now that many people have been infected with Covid and have some degree of immunity against it, Covid infections no longer are holding back flu and RSV, effectively explaining why those illnesses now are making a comeback.
I wonder what you think about that argument. (Webby is a Director of a WHO Collaborating Center, so he's suspect in my book.) The same article initially claims that masks and lockdowns were responsible for "preventing flu and RSV from infiltrating human nostrils.” The article is ambiguous about whether Webby is responsible for that claim or whether the idea about masks and lockdowns having stopped flu and RSV for two years is the author’s invention. Regardless, I know masks and lockdowns are completely ineffective at stopping transmission of airborne viruses (and may even increase rates of transmission in lots of ways, including that contaminated masks become vectors for disease transmission while also exposing the wearer to more concentrated viral loads, and lockdowns prevent people from exercising and getting fresh air while confining them to enclosed spaces where they are more likely to be infected). If the article makes such a ridiculous assertion about masks and lockdowns, should we have confidence in what it says about viral interference?
I’ve always thought it likely that the real reason for the absence of flu and RSV during the past couple of years is that flu, RSV, colds, and the “crud” all were re-labeled as Covid to ramp up fake case counts, and so I wonder whether the suggestion that viral interference explains the two-year absence of other respiratory infections is simply cover for having falsely re-labeled flu as Covid for a couple of years. Indeed, as for the idea that Covid no longer is holding flu/RSV in check, it’s my understanding that there is as much or more Covid circulating right now as at any time during the declared pandemic. If viral interference really could explain the absence of flu and RSV, then shouldn’t Covid still be holding the other respiratory illnesses in check?
I think Webby is full of it, and the much more likely explanation for the reemergence of flu and RSV is that a) SARS-CoV-2 has mutated into a less dominant form and b) the injections are suppressing interferon, which is required to keep these viral infections at bay, so people are getting seriously ill whereas in the past they may have had no or mild symptoms of infection.
These articles often contain factual information mixed in with complete tripe (such as the ridiculous assertion that masks and lockdowns prevented viral transmission), and I don't think that's an accident. It's actually a technique for cultivating a sense of credibility in the reader. It reminds me of the former CIA agent whose interview has been doing the rounds lately. He recounted how he would befriend journalists, feed them tidbits of factual information in order to gain their trust, then when the Agency wanted to spread a particular piece of mis- or disinformation, he would tell it to these journos and they would publicise it because they saw him as a credible source.
Viral interference has been observed for many years; it isn't something that was invented out of whole cloth for the current scamdemic.
I have no doubt that many cases of flu, colds etc were creatively relabelled as COVID, but here in Australia, our sentinel public health labs conducted just as many PCR tests for influenza viruses as pre-scamdemic, and a dramatically lower percentage of them than normal came back positive.
That's the question I ask myself every day: how much longer can this go on? It reminds me of the Solzhenitsyn quote: "They lie to us, we know they're lying, they know we know they're lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them." There's a good chunk of the population that knows that something is really wrong, but they don't want to confront just how bad the situation is, so they tolerate the official lies. While they remain receptive to the official narrative (even though they don't really believe it), those in power will keep on lying... because they can.
The credible evidence they claim doesn't exist also includes actuarial data, insurance data, coroner reports, trial data, admissions of fraud under oath, court rulings, submissions addressed directly to them from groups of honest doctors, and death as, literally, a listed side-effect. Traditionally, less credible evidence is anecdotal, however with such widespread corruption in this 5g warfare, particularly of 'science', i argue that anecdotal evidence is currently gold standard.
The scientific process begins with observation of a phenomenon, which is essentially an anecdote, and then forming a hypothesis to test via an experiment or study. As in "Anecdotally, I am noticing that lots of healthy young and middle-aged people are abruptly dropping dead. I hypothesise that their deaths are due to them being exposed to a novel technology never before deployed en masse upon human beings. I would like to test my hypothesis by comparing the death rate and causes of death in people who have taken the experimental technology, to the rate and causes in people who have not. Please provide me with deidentified data on the 'vaccination' status of all people who have died in the last 2 years, which can be obtained through the Australian Immunisation Register which is linked to each Australian's Medicare number. Oh, you can't/won't provide me with this information, because... reasons?"
This post is outstanding. The excellent summary of the many ways the experimental Covid-19 injections cause disease and death is especially illuminating -- and very helpful to have captured in one place. Thank you for your excellent work!
Thank you for reading it. It's grim work, bringing all of this together, but I really feel it has to be done in order to arm people against all the lies.
A top post, Robyn. It must be one of the best Substack posts ever. It certainly gets my vote for the best 'Stick it Right Up Them Award'.
Thank you, that means a lot to me. I would dearly love to deliver that award in person, especially to the media whores whose complicity has been crucial to the success of this entire operation.
Love your style, much like my own on my secondary substack (Full Broadside). Discussing with my wife whether she will consider a consultation with you for her chronic scleroderma. I want her off those damn drugs so much. Thank you.
P.S. Thanks for helping me identify the blackberry nightshade that is growing all over my property!
I'm more than happy to have a chat with your wife to discuss how I might be able to help her. When she's ready, she can send me her details at https://empowertotalhealth.com.au/consult-with-robyn/.
Thank you. She is pretty stubborn and resigned to a dreary, chronically ill life, sadly. She seems convinced you won't be able to help even before she has tried. I'll do my best to persuade but it's gunna be difficult.
I got into bush food and herbalism in the hope of finding some plants that might replace the toxic poisons the white coats are administering her. It's slow progress. I publish one or two new species per month. Cheers.
Sorry to hear that. It's very frustrating to be close to someone who has given up on themselves. I've had this happen in my own family. All you can do is put the information in front of her, and hope that she will show interest in it.
Terrific summary - put's academic meat on the bones of my suspicions.
On an anticipated shingles surge following compromised immune systems post-vaccine, my heart goes out to the jabbed for what is to come. I had shingles a decade ago and, apart from the inflammatory response with flu-like symptoms, the post-infection neuralgia was the worst pain I have ever experienced in my life, a pain that I wouldn't wish on even the most ideologically belligerent pro-Covid-vaxxer.
But, still, there's a vaccine for that, of course, and it could well be an mRNA one if the future of mRNA vaccines for every disease under the sun comes to pass. With the stunning success of the Covid mRNA 'vaccines', what could possibly go wrong with that scenario?
Shingles is really nasty. One of my aunties nearly went blind from it.
And yes, you'd better believe there's an mRNA quaxine for shingles in the works... and the rest.
Shared to QLD Health FB page...as usual!
I'm amazed they haven't blocked you yet ;-)!
I notice our PM has plenty of time to entertain Billy G and plan for the next 'pandemic,' but Aussies dropping dead since the shots were forced upon the public doesn't pique his interest, the silence is deafening! Great post again BTW.
It's beyond disgusting that Albo the Brave can have an 'audience' with Gates (at taxpayers' expense, naturally) but we, the people he is supposed to be representing, aren't given a transcript of their discussion. And not a peep from the media about how inappropriate this is.
Totally agree, why all the secrecy? Albo the brave, ma ha ha! Sadly, it's even less accurate to call him Albo the intelligent, have you seen this 2 minute video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LxLMEXEkOrlM/
My husband came up with the moniker Albo the Brave. I think it fits beautifully.
I'm so glad to know that I can charge a car overnight using solar panels. Is this an effect of climate change?
We would need to ask Albo, the self-appointed authority on climate change:-)
Now that would be a conversation for the ages!
Great article, as always! And shocking.
Short time ago, a friend from Peru told me that her best friend died during sleep, due to a severe heart attack. She was 26 years old and she was okay, she still talked to people before she went to bed. However, in that night she had this severe heart attack and never woke up any more.
I can not tell 100% if she was vaccinated but it is 99% certain because this is Peru and almost all younger people there are vaccinated, otherwise they were not even allowed to visit a normal supermarket.... Yeah, Peru is one of the worst tyrannical places with regard to covid policies. And I also told my friend that it was likely the vaccine and she did not disagree.. I mean, had her best friend not been vaccinated, she would have told me that in the moment when I suspected that it was the vaccine.
She died on a Sunday and was buried on the following Tuesday. On Tuesday, short time before they wanted to bury her, she suddenly had blood in her mouth and on her head... that ran and dropped down, so they had to clean it... This was extremely traumatic for my friend and for the familiy of this dead person... So now I am wondering, is this normal? Do dead people suddenly start bleeding out of their mouth a few days after they died?
My friend believes that they had done an autopsy or so and that this has caused the bleeding, but why so late? If the autopsy caused it, then why did it not start immediately during or after the autopsy? Why did it start right before they wanted to bury her?
So, I wanted to ask you, Robyn, could these bleedings in some way be an indication that the vaccine was involved here or is this just a normal happening?
I'm so sorry to hear about your Peruvian friend's best friend. From what I've heard, Peru was an utter hell-hole during the scamdemic.
As for her friend bleeding from her mouth 2 days after death, I have never heard of this in my life. Blood begins to pool and coagulate in the lower part of the body within hours of death (livor mortis). To have blood running from her mouth and head is just extraordinary. Perhaps you could reach out to Dr Ryan Col (https://twitter.com/drcole12) to get his take.
Robyn, I read your post when you first published it and then again today. It’s truly outstanding. You’ve done a real service summarizing in one place the many ways the experimental Covid injections cause harm.
One of the mechanisms, impaired immune function, makes clear the transfection agents damage the immune system and make people more susceptible to infection. An article on viral interference (authored by Amber Dance) got my attention. It quotes Richard Webby, a virologist, for the proposition that viral interference from Covid may have shut down flu and RSV for the first couple of years of the declared pandemic. Webby says that now that many people have been infected with Covid and have some degree of immunity against it, Covid infections no longer are holding back flu and RSV, effectively explaining why those illnesses now are making a comeback.
I wonder what you think about that argument. (Webby is a Director of a WHO Collaborating Center, so he's suspect in my book.) The same article initially claims that masks and lockdowns were responsible for "preventing flu and RSV from infiltrating human nostrils.” The article is ambiguous about whether Webby is responsible for that claim or whether the idea about masks and lockdowns having stopped flu and RSV for two years is the author’s invention. Regardless, I know masks and lockdowns are completely ineffective at stopping transmission of airborne viruses (and may even increase rates of transmission in lots of ways, including that contaminated masks become vectors for disease transmission while also exposing the wearer to more concentrated viral loads, and lockdowns prevent people from exercising and getting fresh air while confining them to enclosed spaces where they are more likely to be infected). If the article makes such a ridiculous assertion about masks and lockdowns, should we have confidence in what it says about viral interference?
I’ve always thought it likely that the real reason for the absence of flu and RSV during the past couple of years is that flu, RSV, colds, and the “crud” all were re-labeled as Covid to ramp up fake case counts, and so I wonder whether the suggestion that viral interference explains the two-year absence of other respiratory infections is simply cover for having falsely re-labeled flu as Covid for a couple of years. Indeed, as for the idea that Covid no longer is holding flu/RSV in check, it’s my understanding that there is as much or more Covid circulating right now as at any time during the declared pandemic. If viral interference really could explain the absence of flu and RSV, then shouldn’t Covid still be holding the other respiratory illnesses in check?
I think Webby is full of it, and the much more likely explanation for the reemergence of flu and RSV is that a) SARS-CoV-2 has mutated into a less dominant form and b) the injections are suppressing interferon, which is required to keep these viral infections at bay, so people are getting seriously ill whereas in the past they may have had no or mild symptoms of infection.
These articles often contain factual information mixed in with complete tripe (such as the ridiculous assertion that masks and lockdowns prevented viral transmission), and I don't think that's an accident. It's actually a technique for cultivating a sense of credibility in the reader. It reminds me of the former CIA agent whose interview has been doing the rounds lately. He recounted how he would befriend journalists, feed them tidbits of factual information in order to gain their trust, then when the Agency wanted to spread a particular piece of mis- or disinformation, he would tell it to these journos and they would publicise it because they saw him as a credible source.
Viral interference has been observed for many years; it isn't something that was invented out of whole cloth for the current scamdemic.
I have no doubt that many cases of flu, colds etc were creatively relabelled as COVID, but here in Australia, our sentinel public health labs conducted just as many PCR tests for influenza viruses as pre-scamdemic, and a dramatically lower percentage of them than normal came back positive.
That's the question I ask myself every day: how much longer can this go on? It reminds me of the Solzhenitsyn quote: "They lie to us, we know they're lying, they know we know they're lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them." There's a good chunk of the population that knows that something is really wrong, but they don't want to confront just how bad the situation is, so they tolerate the official lies. While they remain receptive to the official narrative (even though they don't really believe it), those in power will keep on lying... because they can.
That's really the tell - they don't have a credible explanation, they're not interested in finding one, and they shoot down anyone who provides one.