Unsurprisingly, I am not surprised. I used to work in the federal public service (Department of Health) in Canberra (three and a half decades of it - you get less for murder!) and, amongst other ways of making life better for the Australian people, prepared numerous replies to incoming correspondence for Ministerial signature. The aim was always to avoid answering the question, and dodge the substantive issues raised, and to stick to the approved government talking points. Worked like a charm in discouraging any further bothersome interaction with the citizenry.
I don’t know why I’m disappointed, it’s not like I expected someone to admit they know what they are doing is criminal. Thanks for at least making them know that people are watching their actions.
Robyn,
Unsurprisingly, I am not surprised. I used to work in the federal public service (Department of Health) in Canberra (three and a half decades of it - you get less for murder!) and, amongst other ways of making life better for the Australian people, prepared numerous replies to incoming correspondence for Ministerial signature. The aim was always to avoid answering the question, and dodge the substantive issues raised, and to stick to the approved government talking points. Worked like a charm in discouraging any further bothersome interaction with the citizenry.
Surely, that totally independent panel of experts at PF-ATAGI-ZER couldn't be wrong with some facts - shock horror- surely not !
I don’t know why I’m disappointed, it’s not like I expected someone to admit they know what they are doing is criminal. Thanks for at least making them know that people are watching their actions.