Not sure about the use of the word 'inoculate' in this article. A Vaccine is the product which is injected into the body so someone is vaccinated in this process. Inoculation is the intention of vaccination in that a disease agent is implanted when the vaccine is injected with the aim of provoking an immune response. When the immune response is considered sufficient to give the protection required we can say that that is immunisation, ie. the person is immune to the disease. People mistakenly interchange these three as if they are one and the same. The mRNA injection does NOT contain a portion of any virus, none at all and its action we are told is by provoking the cells to produce a Spike Protein and it is this that is intended to trigger the immune response. Despite the recent re-definition by the rules in use since whenever the mRNA shot is NOT a true 'vaccine' and since the outset it has been stated and still is the accepted mantra that the mRNA shots do NOT prevent infection NOR transmission to another and MAY - repeat MAY reduce symptoms if infected = NOT a 'vaccine'.
I'm well aware that the COVID-19 injections are not vaccines, which is why I never describe them as such. I usually refer to them simply as "injections" however sometimes, for the sake of not using the same word over and over, I look for a synonym.
I'll go with that. You are very thorough is my impression though the average people who have not done any homework think that getting vaccinated is automatically meaning immunized which outbreaks of say measles in highly vaccinated populations have proved is not the case. The percentages of hospital admission and deaths in the Covid jabbed is now far out numbering the non-jabbed particularly in over 60's.
Splendid. And my brain didn't really start to hurt until about halfway through (which is good going for someone at my age these days). Should be a nail in the coffin of the Covid vaxx but, alas, we don't live in a sane world where scientific rigour still applies.
Well done! It was a pretty brain-hurty article ;-). I keep thinking "surely THIS is the final nail in the coffin; there's nothing left standing of the house of cards" but somehow the scamdemic continues.
Wow. So much time and effort must go into research and writing these long messages. But to be honest, I find the length is overwhelming for me. Like too much all at once. I usually just skim through most of them.
I could try reading one section each day to break it down. If I find it too much still, is there an option to receive one email every 2 to 4 weeks? Just seeing what my options are.
Hi Nathan. I hear ya! The posts on scientific articles are a tough slog for people not familiar with the subject matter. I try to break down the jargon used in the articles to make it more understandable for the average Joe, as much as I can.
But I do think it's important for all of us to push ourselves to wrap our minds around the aspects of the scamdemic that we don't yet fully understand. For me, that's the financial side; I've never been terribly interested in economics and finance, so when I first heard Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus talking about the role that central banks, unfunded pension liabilities and the repo market were playing, I started to glaze over. But I made myself continue listening, look up all the terms I didn't understand, and keep exposing myself to this information until I could understand at least well enough to give a rough summary to someone else. (This is the grammar-logic-rhetoric process of the trivium method which I mentioned in the webinar on critical thinking earlier this week, see https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/join-me-for-a-free-webinar-on-critical.)
We've been so dumbed-down by our industrial-model schooling, the dross that is passed off as 'entertainment', and attention-murdering social media, that most adults have the concentration span of a cognitively-impaired gnat. We actually have to exercise will-power to rebuild that concentration and learning muscle. Otherwise we're sitting ducks for the predator class who want us to be passive, dumb schmucks who mindlessly consume their "feed" of swill and never question anything in that trough.
I don't paywall any of my content so currently there's no option to reduce the frequency of substack posts you get from me, but I won't be offended if you don't read every single one of them with rapt attention :).
But I do invite you to challenge yourself to take on some of the tougher posts. Many people are auditory learners, so you might find it suits your learning style to listen to the podcast episode while you read the accompanying post.
Spot on Robin. The brain is like a muscle - use it or lose it, and the more you exercise it the stronger and tougher it gets. Nobody simply jumped up out of a seat they sat in everyday and thought I will run a marathon - well maybe they thought it until 50-100m down the track they were wheezing like they were dying with jelly for legs.
Not sure about the use of the word 'inoculate' in this article. A Vaccine is the product which is injected into the body so someone is vaccinated in this process. Inoculation is the intention of vaccination in that a disease agent is implanted when the vaccine is injected with the aim of provoking an immune response. When the immune response is considered sufficient to give the protection required we can say that that is immunisation, ie. the person is immune to the disease. People mistakenly interchange these three as if they are one and the same. The mRNA injection does NOT contain a portion of any virus, none at all and its action we are told is by provoking the cells to produce a Spike Protein and it is this that is intended to trigger the immune response. Despite the recent re-definition by the rules in use since whenever the mRNA shot is NOT a true 'vaccine' and since the outset it has been stated and still is the accepted mantra that the mRNA shots do NOT prevent infection NOR transmission to another and MAY - repeat MAY reduce symptoms if infected = NOT a 'vaccine'.
I'm well aware that the COVID-19 injections are not vaccines, which is why I never describe them as such. I usually refer to them simply as "injections" however sometimes, for the sake of not using the same word over and over, I look for a synonym.
I'll go with that. You are very thorough is my impression though the average people who have not done any homework think that getting vaccinated is automatically meaning immunized which outbreaks of say measles in highly vaccinated populations have proved is not the case. The percentages of hospital admission and deaths in the Covid jabbed is now far out numbering the non-jabbed particularly in over 60's.
Splendid. And my brain didn't really start to hurt until about halfway through (which is good going for someone at my age these days). Should be a nail in the coffin of the Covid vaxx but, alas, we don't live in a sane world where scientific rigour still applies.
Many thanks.
Well done! It was a pretty brain-hurty article ;-). I keep thinking "surely THIS is the final nail in the coffin; there's nothing left standing of the house of cards" but somehow the scamdemic continues.
Hi Robyn.
Wow. So much time and effort must go into research and writing these long messages. But to be honest, I find the length is overwhelming for me. Like too much all at once. I usually just skim through most of them.
I could try reading one section each day to break it down. If I find it too much still, is there an option to receive one email every 2 to 4 weeks? Just seeing what my options are.
Just feedback.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Hi Nathan. I hear ya! The posts on scientific articles are a tough slog for people not familiar with the subject matter. I try to break down the jargon used in the articles to make it more understandable for the average Joe, as much as I can.
But I do think it's important for all of us to push ourselves to wrap our minds around the aspects of the scamdemic that we don't yet fully understand. For me, that's the financial side; I've never been terribly interested in economics and finance, so when I first heard Catherine Austin Fitts and John Titus talking about the role that central banks, unfunded pension liabilities and the repo market were playing, I started to glaze over. But I made myself continue listening, look up all the terms I didn't understand, and keep exposing myself to this information until I could understand at least well enough to give a rough summary to someone else. (This is the grammar-logic-rhetoric process of the trivium method which I mentioned in the webinar on critical thinking earlier this week, see https://robynchuter.substack.com/p/join-me-for-a-free-webinar-on-critical.)
We've been so dumbed-down by our industrial-model schooling, the dross that is passed off as 'entertainment', and attention-murdering social media, that most adults have the concentration span of a cognitively-impaired gnat. We actually have to exercise will-power to rebuild that concentration and learning muscle. Otherwise we're sitting ducks for the predator class who want us to be passive, dumb schmucks who mindlessly consume their "feed" of swill and never question anything in that trough.
I don't paywall any of my content so currently there's no option to reduce the frequency of substack posts you get from me, but I won't be offended if you don't read every single one of them with rapt attention :).
But I do invite you to challenge yourself to take on some of the tougher posts. Many people are auditory learners, so you might find it suits your learning style to listen to the podcast episode while you read the accompanying post.
HTH.
Spot on Robin. The brain is like a muscle - use it or lose it, and the more you exercise it the stronger and tougher it gets. Nobody simply jumped up out of a seat they sat in everyday and thought I will run a marathon - well maybe they thought it until 50-100m down the track they were wheezing like they were dying with jelly for legs.
We all need some levity in the face of unrelenting bad news!!!