I love that C.S. Lewis quote. Previously, I would have agreed with the 'never attribute evil intent when well-meaning ineptitude will do' sentiment. Yet it seems impossible here. How, for example, would you construct a benign explanation for using these millions to exert influence on public policy via: psychological warfare, disinformation about vitamins, denying access to Ivermectin, ignoring natural immunity, persisting with deadly hospital protocols, falsifying data to the level it has occurred, etc, etc.?
I suspect that some people within the older, larger and more politically-connected foundations (e.g. Rockefeller) are quite aware of what's going on, but the vast majority of the people who work there, and all of those in the newer, lesser foundations are just caught up in the groupthink. Just think of how hard it is to get your own friends and family members to even look at data that contradict the narrative; well-meaning people who work in the lower levels of foundations are probably pretty much like them.
To think that my opinions of Covid 19 (and all the related crap that goes with it) needs to be outed and highlighted as dangerous to others!
So. . . . . our opinions now need to be Newmark's??? Then they will be correct???
I endeavour to be diverse, equable and inclusive in my dealings with others but am not egoic enough to think that my thoughts are to be followed by another.
I asked my dog what she thought about being cured of a ' disease ' that she didn't have. She didn't bother to reply. Maybe I'll follow her lead when I next see Big Pharma crap. I won't reply and I won't follow.
Now, now. If you had become rich by turning an email list in a multibillion dollar online marketplace, you would have earned the right to tell everyone else what they ought to believe. That's all it takes - you don't have to have studied philosophy, or history, or theology, or psychology, or economics, or any other relevant discipline that might help to shed light on how we can best make decisions - you just have to make a big ol' pile of money, and then you're entitled to tell other people how to run their lives.
BTW your dog displayed a degree of wisdom that is quite hard to find among humans ;-).
I love that C.S. Lewis quote. Previously, I would have agreed with the 'never attribute evil intent when well-meaning ineptitude will do' sentiment. Yet it seems impossible here. How, for example, would you construct a benign explanation for using these millions to exert influence on public policy via: psychological warfare, disinformation about vitamins, denying access to Ivermectin, ignoring natural immunity, persisting with deadly hospital protocols, falsifying data to the level it has occurred, etc, etc.?
I suspect that some people within the older, larger and more politically-connected foundations (e.g. Rockefeller) are quite aware of what's going on, but the vast majority of the people who work there, and all of those in the newer, lesser foundations are just caught up in the groupthink. Just think of how hard it is to get your own friends and family members to even look at data that contradict the narrative; well-meaning people who work in the lower levels of foundations are probably pretty much like them.
To think that my opinions of Covid 19 (and all the related crap that goes with it) needs to be outed and highlighted as dangerous to others!
So. . . . . our opinions now need to be Newmark's??? Then they will be correct???
I endeavour to be diverse, equable and inclusive in my dealings with others but am not egoic enough to think that my thoughts are to be followed by another.
I asked my dog what she thought about being cured of a ' disease ' that she didn't have. She didn't bother to reply. Maybe I'll follow her lead when I next see Big Pharma crap. I won't reply and I won't follow.
Now, now. If you had become rich by turning an email list in a multibillion dollar online marketplace, you would have earned the right to tell everyone else what they ought to believe. That's all it takes - you don't have to have studied philosophy, or history, or theology, or psychology, or economics, or any other relevant discipline that might help to shed light on how we can best make decisions - you just have to make a big ol' pile of money, and then you're entitled to tell other people how to run their lives.
BTW your dog displayed a degree of wisdom that is quite hard to find among humans ;-).
Just when I think I can’t be surprised anymore by these people, I read about “Feminist glaciology”
Yep, it's a thing. I looked it up, and then regretted it very promptly.