I couldn't quite believe it, so I had to click on the link. But it was true alright. In Austria you could get a free, 30-minute consultation with a sex worker, dressed in a sexy-nurse uniform if you took the jab. And while 'medical procedures' are a well enough known paraphilia, it's probably the case (but I'm only guessing) they were just horny guys taking advantage of free sex, especially the 14-year olds - 14 being the age of consent in Austria. Though I'm not quite sure why they needed to be accompanied by an adult. Then again, Austria is home to the articulation of certain psychological insights one doesn't like to think about too much, so hopefully the boys weren't accompanied by their mothers.
Still, today's blog was just more evidence of your gift for penetrating, wide-ranging research, which always illuminates.
And just when I thought I'd pegged Bill Gates as the El Supremo of vaccine psychos, after reading your research about the research, I think I'm going to have to downgrade his status to 'first among equals'.
Two generations have already been gravely harmed by this regimen. May future generations benefit free from needle attacks with excellent health and full cognitive achievement intact.
The title of the paper says "Imperfect messengers ...". They expect doctors to be mere messengers of the establishment Gods. They don't expect doctors to think for themselves or understand anything. So we have only 10% of the doctors who are capable of thinking.
I wrote about this before the pandemic.
Nobel Prize winning proof that most doctors lack fundamental medical knowledge and thus sicken us with devastating chronic diseases
I wonder how many of the 10.1% of primary care physicians who do not agree that vaccines are safe, do still inject vaccines into patients/victims? How many believe only the bs19 vax is unsafe but all other vaxxes are manna from heaven?
I know a doctor who confesses privately that he shudders to think how much damage he's done to children over the years, but he keeps jabbing them nonetheless because it's how he makes a buck.
I used it intentionally in this case, just like other marginalised groups have adopted terms that were intended to slander them (such as 'wog' and 'nigger'), as a subversive measure.
One of the ways they control information is by controlling what words are used and how to use them. Words matter. Just ask anyone in the law, PR and advertising industries. By using their words and terms, thus we are handing them an early and significant victory in any debate. And it is hard to recover from that early loss.
By using their words and phrases shows that we are not thinking and are diction-challenged. If we don't think in any intellectual debate, how can we possible hope and expect to win?
Wow. I have not seen the word "wog" used by anyone for the longest time. It was still used by school kids up until the mid 1980s. I still fondly remember a blond Aussie boy called a Vietnamese boy "wog". Those were the good old care-free days....!
There was an Aussie TV comedy called "Wogs at work" during the pre-internet days.
Words only have meanings in their context and environments. I remember a Nigerian Gas company naming itself, naturally, Nig Gas. Some black Americans went on TV to complain! LOL! I doubt that some of the complainers could even find Nigeria on a map.
In my high school in the late 80s, about 40% of the students were of Greek origin, and they called themselves 'wogs' as a matter of pride. It was my first exposure to the deliberate adoption of a term of derision as a subversive act. It stuck with me.
Yep, ProVaxxer, ChoiceVaxxer, AntiVaxxer, I made up the term ChoiceVax so these people could have a defensible position to oppose ForceVax. (Check out my ChoiceVax position)
It IS terrifying. And not new. The medical profession had the highest percentage of members of the Nazi party well before WWII broke out. And nurses carried out the T4 program, euthanising disabled children in order to improve 'racial hygiene'.
I couldn't quite believe it, so I had to click on the link. But it was true alright. In Austria you could get a free, 30-minute consultation with a sex worker, dressed in a sexy-nurse uniform if you took the jab. And while 'medical procedures' are a well enough known paraphilia, it's probably the case (but I'm only guessing) they were just horny guys taking advantage of free sex, especially the 14-year olds - 14 being the age of consent in Austria. Though I'm not quite sure why they needed to be accompanied by an adult. Then again, Austria is home to the articulation of certain psychological insights one doesn't like to think about too much, so hopefully the boys weren't accompanied by their mothers.
Still, today's blog was just more evidence of your gift for penetrating, wide-ranging research, which always illuminates.
And just when I thought I'd pegged Bill Gates as the El Supremo of vaccine psychos, after reading your research about the research, I think I'm going to have to downgrade his status to 'first among equals'.
Two generations have already been gravely harmed by this regimen. May future generations benefit free from needle attacks with excellent health and full cognitive achievement intact.
"“Trust”. “Belief”. “Faith”. “Vaccine champions”"
The title of the paper says "Imperfect messengers ...". They expect doctors to be mere messengers of the establishment Gods. They don't expect doctors to think for themselves or understand anything. So we have only 10% of the doctors who are capable of thinking.
I wrote about this before the pandemic.
Nobel Prize winning proof that most doctors lack fundamental medical knowledge and thus sicken us with devastating chronic diseases
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3475556
I wonder how many of the 10.1% of primary care physicians who do not agree that vaccines are safe, do still inject vaccines into patients/victims? How many believe only the bs19 vax is unsafe but all other vaxxes are manna from heaven?
I know a doctor who confesses privately that he shudders to think how much damage he's done to children over the years, but he keeps jabbing them nonetheless because it's how he makes a buck.
I have great difficulty in processing/accepting that anyone could do that.
Me too.
I'm a medic and neither myself nor colleagues are rabid pro-vax. I see a case for them in defined groups but to mandate them for all is abhorrent.
Could you suggest one 'defined group' that would benefit from vaxxes and would that be all vaxxes or just the covid19 'vax'?
They are transitioning to ChoiceVax, and away from ForceVax. This is good, the freedom position is Choice, the tyrant position is Force.
ForceVax will be back once the digital tracking systems are in place, we currently have a little breathing space only....
I'm afraid you're correct. The 'vaccine passports' are just a trial run for the comprehensive track, trace, database system that's in the works.
Can't we think of another word rather than merely parroting theirs, like "antivaxxers", "anti-vaxxers"?
I used it intentionally in this case, just like other marginalised groups have adopted terms that were intended to slander them (such as 'wog' and 'nigger'), as a subversive measure.
Of course, you use whatever terms you want.
My thinking was/is this:
One of the ways they control information is by controlling what words are used and how to use them. Words matter. Just ask anyone in the law, PR and advertising industries. By using their words and terms, thus we are handing them an early and significant victory in any debate. And it is hard to recover from that early loss.
By using their words and phrases shows that we are not thinking and are diction-challenged. If we don't think in any intellectual debate, how can we possible hope and expect to win?
Wow. I have not seen the word "wog" used by anyone for the longest time. It was still used by school kids up until the mid 1980s. I still fondly remember a blond Aussie boy called a Vietnamese boy "wog". Those were the good old care-free days....!
There was an Aussie TV comedy called "Wogs at work" during the pre-internet days.
Words only have meanings in their context and environments. I remember a Nigerian Gas company naming itself, naturally, Nig Gas. Some black Americans went on TV to complain! LOL! I doubt that some of the complainers could even find Nigeria on a map.
In my high school in the late 80s, about 40% of the students were of Greek origin, and they called themselves 'wogs' as a matter of pride. It was my first exposure to the deliberate adoption of a term of derision as a subversive act. It stuck with me.
Yep, ProVaxxer, ChoiceVaxxer, AntiVaxxer, I made up the term ChoiceVax so these people could have a defensible position to oppose ForceVax. (Check out my ChoiceVax position)
It IS terrifying. And not new. The medical profession had the highest percentage of members of the Nazi party well before WWII broke out. And nurses carried out the T4 program, euthanising disabled children in order to improve 'racial hygiene'.