14 Comments

Current housing regulations enshrined in Building Codes Australia, plus the energy assessment requirement have resulted in a house building industry that produces housing more akin to people living in a plastic bag.

Put another way. A 6 Star home (as claimed) will be like living in a plastic bag for the occupants. With an air exchange rate that is extremely low due to extensive sealing of the outer shell, a family of two adults and two children can be expected to put 60 litres of moisture into the indoor air each week - which is unlikely to leave the lived volume of the house.

Mould needs only moisture, air and a food to thrive and there will be a mould for every food. Modern building methods forced due to regulatory requirements ignores health and ensures an active 'mould factory' as the normal living environment.

The housing regulations currently enforced guarantee a very unhealthy living space for people on many levels with mould and radiated electrical energies two of the most unhealthy.

I think we can all agree a plastic bag is not a healthy place to live. Look around in your living spaces.

Expand full comment

That's an excellent point. These building codes are in large part a consequence of the "climate change" agenda. So the building codes which are supposed to reduce energy consumption in order to mitigate climate change cause mould, which is then blamed on climate change. Brilliant.

Expand full comment

I convinced myself that anthropogenic climate change is real. How did I do that? Four years ago I moved and the climate changed. Where I live now is way different than where I used to live. Most of the year it’s cooler/colder with snow in the winter and freezing temperatures. So, there you have it.

Seriously, people like Tony Heller(realclimatescience.com) and Alex Epstein(The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels) have been telling us(if we listen) about how we are being lied to and manipulated by governments. In his book Alex shows how much safer we are, how weather related deaths are much lower, improved sanitation, greater abundance of food due to fossil fuel. Tony Heller publishes videos on YouTube https://youtu.be/5y-9TWWxUZU?si=zk9-AiG-CaNIwPAm.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the links. Tony is brilliant, and Alex is a cogent advocate for ameliorating our species' negative impact on the environment by raising humans out of abject poverty.

Expand full comment

Outstanding article Robyn!! You nailed the lies behind the climate apocalypse and how the medical profession is now being hamstrung into promoting these falsehoods. I love how you ended the article with practice what you were taught but always remember much of what you were taught is peppered with lies. That’s why as providers we need to be constantly vigilant and practice humble scientific curiosity (a phrase I stole from a recent Dark Horse Podcast)!!

Expand full comment

Humble scientific curiosity - now that's a phrase I resonate with! I've been having a lot of conversations lately about what true intelligence is, and I'm struggling to come up with a better explanation than this: truly intelligent people are incurably curious!

Expand full comment

Even though ‘climate change’ is proven to be ‘climate scam’, the narrative rolls-on regardless of truth and reality, the climate movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmfRG8-RHEI

‘Climate change’ is an important cog in the current reset. Regarding resets, this doco was released just 3 days ago and provides some excellent analyses of engineering societies: https://stewpeters.com/old-world-order-documentary/#gf_12

Expand full comment

Have you seen Great Pyramid K 2019 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMAtkjy_YK4)? I found the argument that these massive stone and marble structures, and statuary, were actually poured concrete, very persuasive.

Expand full comment

I haven't seen that particular video before, but am totally on-board with Poured geo-polymers being used on the pyramids, large structures and statues around the world.

Expand full comment

Great work as usual Robyn. Science TM rolls on…

Expand full comment

I tried to follow the science, but it kept leading to the money 🤣.

Expand full comment

Already the call is for worsening anthropogenic extremes, especially higher temperatures.

Having studied climatology, there is quite the constant discussion in academia about the role of different atmospheric gases and their role in radiative forcing attributed to human activity.

https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/11175

That said, one of the most potent is water vapor (H2O), both man made and natural. Weather modification and disruption of hydrologic cycles can have global regional impacts as well as something unique such as volcanic activity that may be more of an impact than we first realized. As such we should be suspicious when we see NOAA scrub their site of an early assessment of an underseas volcanic eruption and little mention of it ever since.

-------

Geophys Res Lett. 2022 Jul 16; 49(13): e2022GL099381. 

Published online 2022 Jul 1. doi: 10.1029/2022GL099381

PMCID: PMC9285945

PMID: 35865735

The Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Hydration of the Stratosphere

L. Millán, 1 M. L. Santee, 1 A. Lambert, 1 N. J. Livesey, 1 F. Werner, 1 M. J. Schwartz, 1 H. C. Pumphrey, 2 G. L. Manney, 3 , 4 Y. Wang, 1 , 5 H. Su, 1 L. Wu, 1 W. G. Read, 1 and L. Froidevaux 1

Abstract

Following the 15 January 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai eruption, several trace gases measured by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) displayed anomalous stratospheric values. Trajectories and radiance simulations confirm that the H2O, SO2, and HCl enhancements were injected by the eruption. In comparison with those from previous eruptions, the SO2 and HCl mass injections were unexceptional, although they reached higher altitudes. In contrast, the H2O injection was unprecedented in both magnitude (far exceeding any previous values in the 17‐year MLS record) and altitude (penetrating into the mesosphere). We estimate the mass of H2O injected into the stratosphere to be 146 ± 5 Tg, or ∼10% of the stratospheric burden. It may take several years for the H2O plume to dissipate. This eruption could impact climate not through surface cooling due to sulfate aerosols, but rather through surface warming due to the radiative forcing from the excess stratospheric H2O.

Expand full comment

How do the predicted 'extremes' of heat compare to Earth's temperatures during previous phases of the Holocene, and to the climate optimum for our species based on significant expansion of the human population, and civilisational advance, that took place during the Roman warm period and the Mediaeval warm period?

Totally agree with you that volcanic activity is an overlooked contributor to climate change. As is sunspot activity: https://joannenova.com.au/2024/05/auroras-anyone-the-big-sunspot-cluster-returns-and-its-grumpy/

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Jun 3Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

How can I be "a republican" when I don't even live in the US? Your reaction indicates your own ignorance. By the way, did you even bother reading the post? I cited the IPCC which represents the consensus of climate scientists that you're so impressed by.

Expand full comment