Er, why would the prostate need to remain when all the (reproductive) boy bits have been chopped off? Sounds like they WANT these people to suffer from prostate cancer! And given almost all very old men die WITH prostate cancer (but not of it), it's kind of stupid to leave the prostate in, isn't it? And there's the fast-growing prostate cancers in usually younger men to consider as well (or in this case, younger men who have had surgery to pretend to be 'women')...
Then again, IMO it's pretty stupid to do the gender reassignment surgery in the first place but hey, horses for courses. My only consolation is that these people won't be able to breed afterwards.
Er, why would the prostate need to remain when all the (reproductive) boy bits have been chopped off? Sounds like they WANT these people to suffer from prostate cancer! And given almost all very old men die WITH prostate cancer (but not of it), it's kind of stupid to leave the prostate in, isn't it? And there's the fast-growing prostate cancers in usually younger men to consider as well (or in this case, younger men who have had surgery to pretend to be 'women')...
Then again, IMO it's pretty stupid to do the gender reassignment surgery in the first place but hey, horses for courses. My only consolation is that these people won't be able to breed afterwards.
Ha. Remember this? https://www.wweek.com/news/schools/2018/10/09/a-portland-state-university-professor-made-up-a-study-of-dog-on-dog-sexual-assault-and-got-the-hoax-published/